1.) So why is military service the only "sense of duty" that should be a frame-of-reference for young men?

It's the most basic. If we'd had a draft for the past fify years, there'd be way less vaccine "hesitancy," because men would realize that it's their civic duty to create herd immunity. "Duty" has become a dirty word, and the end of the dradt is, in my opinion, why.

And what would be the "sense of duty," if any, that you believe should be instilled in young women?

Sending their sons to war.

2.) Valuing procreation between men and women doesn't mean we have to stigmatize people who are childless by choice, in the process.

You keep making shit up. I didn't say anything abouut people being "disposaable," and I am not saying people should be "stigmatiized." But parents should be honored for their contribution.

3.) You'll have to be specific when you refer to "their pocky little selves" -- I'm not clear on what behaviors you're admonishing.

I was just saying that people don't become "disposable" just because they make moral choices I don't like. I had no particular sin in mind.

4.) I'll concede I could have done a better job of providing more proactive descriptors, on my end, for broadening the definitions of "masculine" and "feminine." I'm curious what your primary definitions of each would be..."

The traditional male virtues are easy enough to find. You denigrate them in your article. I shouldn't have to list them for you.