Rights, enumerated or not, should not be subject to revocation by judicial fiat, conservative or liberal.

I agree. The problem is that abortion is not clearly such a right. The Roe Court said it is, and the Alito Court says it isn't. In that debate, I tend to side with Alito, because cases recognizing rights are usually accepted by the political process. There has been no push by anyone to appoint justices who will overturn Brown or even Griswold. But Roe has made the nomination process the partisan horror show that it has become. That alone is powerful evidence that it was wrongly decided.

Even RBG wished that Roe had been decided on equal protection grounds rather than liberty grounds. I don't find her equal protection argument persuasive, but she was right that the "liberty" argument was not persuasive. She did note in one speech, however, that abortion was on a favorable political trajectory, which was short-circuited by Roe, denying pro-choice advocates the benefit of a political consensus.