You somehow think this has bearing on other claims so why am I wrong to point out the greater context here?

You're not wrong to point out other concerns. You are wrong to point them out in reply to a comment that was only about sports, and you are wrong to think I don't agree with you regarding some of those other concerns.

I'm pretty sure I said I don't know what to make of the high-T rule. You even quoted me saying so. Then you say "Then you act like high T women should be banned too," What part of my uncertainty did you not get? When I say an argument can be made, I do not mean that the argument wins, just that the subject is debatable.

That's what I meant about the chip on your shoulder. I didn't "act like" I think anyone should be banned. I "acted like" I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. Does uncertainty scare you? You seem not only incapable of it, but even incapable of recognizing it in others.